Showing posts with label Health Insurance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Health Insurance. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Ten Questions to ask your Insurance Agent BEFORE you buy Health Insurance !

Do you ever wonder if you are making the right decisions about health Insurance ? Here are some things to consider:

If you are a business owner, self-employed or an employee of a company that is not offering medical coverage though your employer, you may have to undertake the frustrating, daunting and time consuming task of purchasing health insurance on your own. If this is the case, there are certain things that you can do become an informed consumer so you can ensure that you are purchasing the type of health insurance coverage you really need at a price you can afford.

When you purchase a health insurance plan, it is important that you balance four important variables:
wants, needs, risk and cost, before you spend your money.

Although you may "want" a health plan that offers you 100% coverage and a $5 Copay for prescription medications, you may not "need" this type of health plan if you are healthy, take no medications and do not have any significant health related "risk" factors.

Since a 100% health plan will "cost" significantly more than an 80/20 Plan, it may not be in your best interest to pay higher monthly premiums for 100% coverage if you are currently healthy.

Although no one knows exactly when they will actually use their insurance coverage, considering these four key variables prior to purchasing a health plan is a good rule of thumb.

It is also critical for health insurance consumers to understand that all plans, even 100% Plans, have some form of coverage limitations. Knowing what your policy DOES NOT cover, is more important than knowing what it DOES cover.

The following is a list of 10 key questions that should help health insurance consumers to better understand the coverage limitations of the plans they are considering purchasing. Make sure you ask your insurance agent these questions BEFORE purchasing a health insurance policy.

1. What insurance company do you represent and are you a "captive" agent, "independent" agent or an insurance "broker?" "Captive" agents represent ONE insurance company's products only.

An "independent" agent or insurance "broker," on the other hand, typically represent many quality insurance carriers and can sell a variety of different insurance products without any contractual restrictions.

BEWARE! Dealing with a "captive" agent may limit your choices, since these agents can only sell that particular insurance company's health plans.

2. What is the plan's calendar year Deductible and would I have to pay a separate deductible for each family member if everyone in my family became ill at the same time? The majority of health plans have a per person calendar year deductible, for example, $250, $500, $1,000, or $2,500. Some plans are designed so in a "worse case scenario" only two family members will have to pay their deductible in any given calendar year.

BEWARE! Some plans will require each person in the family to pay their calendar year deductible. This can be a huge financial burden if everyone in the family was involved in an accident or if members of the family became ill at the same time. Many plans have a separate drug deductible before the plan will pay for any medications. Make sure you know what deductibles you will be responsible for before you buy a health plan.

3. What is the plan's Coinsurance percentage and what Stop Loss Number is this percentage based on?

These percentages are typically based on a specific dollar amount, known as the "stop loss number." Here's where it get's tricky. Quite often, health insurance plans have different "stop loss numbers". I have seen some plans that have a "stop loss number" as low as $2,000 and as high as $25,000 or some with none at all.

Let's figure out the insured's maximum out of pocket on an 80/20 plan that has a $1,000 deductible and an 80/20 split of the first $5,000 ("stop loss number.")

$1,000 + 20% of $5,000 ($1,000) = A Maximum Out of Pocket of $2,000.

Now, let's figure out the insured's maximum out of pocket on an 80/20 plan that has a $250 deductible and a $10,000 "stop loss number."

$250 + 20% of $10,000 ($2000) = A Maximum Out of Pocket of $2,250. (Note: Total does not include any separate "service deductibles" or access fees. Many low quality plans also have these.)

Again, after this brief 80/20 cost sharing with the insurance company, also know as a the coinsurance percentage split, most major medical plans will pay 100% of in-network covered charges up to the Lifetime Maximum amount that is specified in the policy.

BEWARE! Some policies on the market are sold with NO stop loss, but still list a coinsurance percentage. Therefore if you purchase an 80/20 with no stop loss, you will actually be paying 20% of all of your medical bills each calendar year. So unless you want to be responsible for 20% of all of your bills, make sure you find out what the "stop loss number" is BEFORE you purchase a health plan!

4. What is the plan's Maximum Out Of Pocket Expenses per year? This expense is a total of all deductibles, plus all coinsurance percentages, plus all applicable "access fees", "service deductibles" or other "fees" outlined in your policy.

BEWARE! Quite often agents neglect to tell prospects about hidden fees, so make sure you have a good grasp on the basics, like deductibles, coinsurance & stop loss numbers. Always ask about additional "fees" BEFORE you purchase the plan!

5. What is the plan's Lifetime Maximum Benefit if I become seriously ill and does the plan have any "per illness" maximums or caps? The majority of health insurance plans have a two million or five million dollar Lifetime Maximum Benefit. The Lifetime Maximum Benefit is the maximum amount the insurance company will pay if you or someone in your family becomes seriously ill.

BEWARE! Some policies will stipulate that there is a maximum benefit cap of $100,000 per illness. This means that you would have to develop many separate and unrelated life-threatening illnesses costing $100,000 or less to qualify for the five million dollar Lifetime Maximum Benefit. Mega Life & Health, Midwest National Life a.k.a. Health Markets, formerly U.I.C.I., endorsed and promoted by the National Association for the Self Employed (N.A.S.E) and the Alliance for Affordable Services are known for selling "schedule" plans with "per illness caps."

6. Is the plan a Schedule Plan, in that it only pays a certain amount for a specific list of procedures? Some health plans only pay a specific dollar amount for certain procedures, despite the fact that the procedure often cost more than the plan stimulates.

BEWARE! Mega Life & Health, Midwest National Life a.k.a. Health Markets, formerly U.I.C.I., endorsed and promoted by the National Association for the Self Employed (NASE) and the Alliance for Affordable Services are known for selling "schedule" plans.

7. Does the plan have unlimited doctor copays or is there a limited number of doctor copay visits allowed each year? Many quality plans have no limit on the number of times you can use your doctor copay.

BEWARE! Several plans have a limit of how many times you can go to the doctor each year for a Copay. Quite often, the limit is 2-4 visits per year.

8. Does the plan offer Prescription Drug Coverage and if it does, what type of coverage? Some plans offer prescription drug benefits on both generic and brand name medications right away. Other plans will require you to pay a separate outpatient prescription drug deductible before you can obtain your prescription medication for a Copay.

BEWARE! Today, many plans offer NO outpatient prescription drug Copay options. Typically, these plans only provide the insured with a discount prescription card which only offers the insured a 10-20% discount on prescription medications. This can lead to catastrophic out of pocket expenses to the insured.

9. Does the plan have any reduction in benefits for Organ Transplants and if so, what is the maximum the plan will pay out for an organ transplant? The majority of quality major medical plans treat organ transplants as any other illness. This means that the insurance company will cover the insured until the Lifetime Maximum Benefit of the plan is reached. Again, in most cases, this Lifetime Maximum is five million dollars. You should accept no less than one million dollars of coverage for Organ Transplants.

BEWARE! Today, some plans only pay a $100,000 maximum benefit for organ transplants. Plans that offer limited organ transplant coverage are extremely risky, since organ transplant procedures often range in the neighborhood of $350-$500K. In addition, it is not uncommon for a transplant patient to need a second organ transplant. Keep in mind, that the $100,000 maximum payment for organ transplants on many plans also includes the cost of expensive anti-rejection medications. If you have an organ transplant, you will quickly reach the $100,000 maximum benefit, which means that you will be required to pay for costly anti-rejection medication out of pocket. This can lead to catastrophic out of pocket costs to the insured.

10. Does the plan have any separate "services deductibles" or "access fee" for each hospital admission or for each outpatient test? Some plans, like Assurant Health's "CoreMed" plan have a separate $750 hospital admission fee for the first three days of each hospital stay. These hospital admission fees may also be called "Access Fees" on other policies. Typically the insured is responsible for paying these access fees for each hospital admission in addition to their calendar year health plan deductible.

Many plans also have a separate deductible for emergency room visits. These deductibles are in place to discourage policyholders from using the emergency room as a doctor's office. Typically, these ER deductibles are waived if the patient is admitted to the hospital.

BEWARE! "Access fees" and "service deductibles" are separate from your plan's calendar year health plan deductible. Be aware that many plans now have benefit "caps" or "access fees" for out-patient services, such as, physical therapy, speech therapy, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, etc. These "benefit caps" could be as little as $500 for each out-patient treatment, which will leave the insured responsible for the remaining balance that is over $500.

Again, "access fees" are additional fees that you may have to pay per treatment before the insurance company will pay the provider. These fees can quickly add up. For example, if you need to have 40 outpatient chemotherapy treatments, and you must pay a $250 "access fee" per treatment, you would have to pay an additional 40 x $250 = $10,000.

Remember, purchasing a health plan is the most important purchase you will ever make. Insist that your insurance agent explain to you exactly what your health plan does and does not cover and take the time to read the "fine print" in the plan brochure and ask questions about terminology you don't completely understand.

In addition, when you receive your health insurance policy in the mail, don't just detach your insurance cards and place them in your wallet or purse and then throw your insurance policy in your desk drawer or filing cabinet. Take the time to sit down and read your policy page by page.

Once you receive your policy, you have a 10-day free look period, so if your coverage is not what you thought you purchased, you have time to call the insurance company and cancel the policy without incurring any fees.

Finally, if your being pitched a health plan that seems too good to be true (e.g. all pre existing conditions are covered, the plan is significantly cheaper than all other plans) contact your state's Department of Insurance BEFORE you buy the policy. Your state's Department of Insurance can tell you if the insurance company is registered in your state and can also tell you if there have been any complaints against that company that have been filed by policyholders.

Remember, if you suspect that your being scammed or you think the agent is trying to sell you a fraudulent insurance policy, (e.g. you have to become a member of a union to qualify for coverage) your state's Department of Insurance can also check to see if any prior disciplinary action has been previously taken against that agent.

Whatever decision you make in regards to your health insurance, please always remember to heed the following words of wisdom.

  • "If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is!" ..........and
  • "If you only buy on price, you get what you pay for!"

http://www.insurancepricedright.com

Technorati : , , ,
Del.icio.us : , , ,
Zooomr : , , ,
Flickr : , , ,

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Aetna Health Reform - Health Care in America

AetnaAetna

A weekly compilation from Aetna of health care-related developments in Washington, D.C. and state legislatures across the country

Week of June 8, 2009

President Obama once again jumped into the Congressional health care reform process last week when he met with key Senators on health care and then sent Senators Kennedy and Baucus a letter outlining his priorities for health care reform. In the letter, the President says he is open to an individual coverage requirement, as long as the poor are excluded from the mandate. His position is very similar to that adopted by Aetna several years ago. But if some were energized by the letter, others were disappointed. President Obama calls for any reform package to include a public health insurance option alongside private plans, an idea that many Republicans strongly oppose. Based on the response of some to the letter last week, the process this summer (see below) could become a contentious one. The President has asked the House and Senate to finish legislation by early August so that he can have a package to sign in October.

Voting is now underway for Modern Healthcare's online poll to determine the "100 Most Powerful People in Healthcare," and Aetna's Chairman and CEO Ron Williams once again is nominated as one of the finalists. To vote, click here.

Federal
The pace of health care reform is accelerating as both the House and Senate sense the public is anxious for action, the President is anxious for action, and the number of legislative days left before the August break is dwindling. The Senate Finance Committee met last week to review its three options papers (Delivery, Coverage and Financing) and will dive further into the details this week. The Committee hopes to release its most specific document to date on June 17 and could begin its mark-up the week of June 22, a process that could take 2-5 days. The HELP Committee is on a similar schedule. It released/leaked a 171-page (one-third of the whole bill) document on coverage, with quality and wellness/prevention still to come. This document may be well short of the final product, but it does provide some insight into the Committee's direction on coverage: Individual and employer coverage mandate; aggressive rating reforms (e.g., no gender or health status allowed); no annual/lifetime limits; a cap on non-claim costs; state-based exchanges; and a public plan. HELP will hold a hearing this week and will begin its mark-up around June 17, which might take ten days. All of this is designed to get a merged Finance/HELP bill to the Senate Floor by the last two weeks in July. The House is on the same pace. The Energy & Commerce Committee has publicized a rough outline of the House bill (a public plan, national exchange, soft individual mandate, national minimum benefit package), which will be marked-up by three House committees in early July in time for a House floor vote in late July/early August.

States
CONNECTICUT: The House did not take action on an amended Senate bill limiting offsets for disability premiums by the end of the regular legislative session on June 3, in effect killing the bill for this year. The State Senate had passed the amended bill one week earlier. The original bill prohibited any social security offsets, potentially increasing disability premiums by an estimated 40 percent or more. Aetna testified at the hearings, launched a legislative outreach for plan sponsors, and met with key members of the Insurance Committee extensively. The original bill was defeated in Committee. However, Sen. Edith Prague revived her bill and after many meetings and proposed compromises, insurers and plan sponsors succeeded in getting the prohibition on offsets limited to SSDI paid to or on behalf of dependent children.

MAINE: The legislature passed a bill repealing the savings offset payment (SOP) mechanism used to fund subsidies for the state's Dirigo health plan and replaced it with a flat 2.14 percent assessment on paid claims. The SOP has been the subject of repeated litigation since its inception in 2003. Health plans were able to get the effective date moved from July 1 to Oct. 1, 2009. The new flat tax applies to claims paid on or after September 1, 2009 and establishes the payment date as 30 days after the end of each month.

MICHIGAN: The House of Representatives and Senate are continuing discussions on their respective health care reform packages. The House is using two work groups to prepare its bills for consideration by the House Health Policy Committee this week. The Michigan Association of Health Plans is participating in the work groups, trying to move House Democratic leadership away from a package of legislation that would harm the individual insurance market. The Senate Health Policy Committee held a single meeting on its reform package. Senator George has announced a public hearing in Detroit on June 15 to hear public testimony on the package. There is considerable opposition to Senator George's plan for covering all of the state's uninsured up to 300 percent of the federal poverty level through payment in lieu of taxes from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, a hospital tax that would be matched by federal funds and a 1.8 percent paid-claims tax that would be paid by insurers and self-funded health plans.

NEBRASKA: The Nebraska legislature recently adjourned after passing several significant bills, including: a bill that amends the Health Insurance Access Act to allow an uninsured access coverage plan to include prescription drug and preventive care coverage, and that removes income as a criterion for eligibility; a bill that amends the state's autism treatment program to require that for every $2 of funding that comes from the state, the program must generate at least $1 in matching private donations; a bill that amends the medical assistance program statute to increase the income eligibility requirements for children under age 19 from 185 to 200 percent of FPL; and a bill that extends the maximum age on sickness and accident policies of an insured's dependents to age 30, up from 23. In addition, several important bills died this session, including one that would have established a commission to develop a comprehensive plan for affordable health insurance with an individual mandate and guaranteed issue as components.

NEVADA: The Governor signed legislation requiring health insurers to cover screening and treatment of autism spectrum disorders for covered persons until the age of 18 or, if enrolled in high school, age 22. The bill also includes coverage limitations for autism treatment, and provides for licensure of behavior analysts and certification of certain autism treatment providers. Beginning January 1, 2011, all group plans would be required to provide coverage, while individual policies will be required to offer a benefit rider to subscribers.

OKLAHOMA: The legislature adjourned May 27, ending a session marked by the early defeat of a controversial autism coverage mandate bill known as "Nick's Law." Ultimately, the only autism-related bill to travel to Governor Brad Henry's desk was a measure regulating autism service providers and establishing an applied behavioral analysis research pilot project. The legislature passed a bill that would establish the Health Care for the Uninsured Board (HUB) to work with the insurance commissioner to certify health insurance programs, educate uninsured consumers about choosing coverage and utilizing medical care, and help qualified individuals become enrolled in a subsidized plan. The bill also authorizes carriers to offer people under 40 a benefit plans that lacks state-mandated benefits providing disclosures are in place. Finally, the bill authorizes the Oklahoma Health Care Authority to add to the premium assistance program, the option to enroll in a high-deductible health plan compatible with a health savings account. Several pieces of significant legislation were killed, including one that would have required health benefit plans to cover all health care services that were deemed by the provider to be medically necessary.

TENNESSEE: The health "Silent PPO" bill, which Aetna helped amend earlier this year, has passed the House and will likely continue to move forward. The Workers' Compensation Advisory Council will review the proposed "Silent PPO" bill related to workers' compensation this week. Aetna continues to work with the sponsor on language and a possible summer study, but he still insists the bill be heard this year. To do so, he must ask the House and Senate to re-open their committees, which have been closed for the year.

TEXAS: As a result of partisan political wrangling, the legislature adjourned this week after failing to pass any legislation that would continue the life of the Texas Department of Insurance. The agency is now scheduled to go into "wind down mode" beginning September 1, 2009. The Governor will likely call a special session to resolve this issue and other issues left undone during the regular session. He could also enter an Executive Order moving the TDI's functions to other agencies temporarily. The legislature did manage to pass some significant bills, including one that would codify a balance billing dispute resolution process. Another bill expands the state's autism mandate from age 6 up to 9 and includes the state's employee group. Other bills provide rules regarding ranking of physicians by health plans (consistent with Aetna's current process); allow the direct employment of physicians by hospitals, which should help eliminate the state's balance billing problem; and require all public colleges and universities to sponsor their own health plans for students. Bills defeated included the Texas Medical Association's omnibus "Code of Conduct" bill. Also, 13 separate bills relating to MLR all died, as did the Speaker Pro Tem's "Silent PPO" bill, which also attempted to regulate self-funded plans, was voted down on the Senate floor.

WASHINGTON: Small employers now have an additional tool to help mitigate the costs of rising health insurance premiums. With the passage of recent legislation, small employers willing to develop and implement an outcome-based employer wellness program can negotiate modest premium reductions with insurers if the employer is able to meet the goals established for the program. Program goals could focus on, for example, increasing the percentage of employees receiving age-appropriate health screenings, increasing the percentage of employees receiving flu shots, or setting a target for the number of employees who stop smoking.

Resources
Transforming Health Care in America
America's Health Insurance Plans

http://www.insurancepricedright.com For Aetna Quotes Online

Aetna is the brand name used for products and services provided by one or more of the Aetna group of subsidiary companies. Those companies include Aetna Health Inc., and Aetna Health Insurance Company.

Technorati : , , , ,
Del.icio.us : , , , ,
Zooomr : , , , ,
Flickr : , , , ,

Wednesday, June 03, 2009

Putting the Insurance Back in Insurance

Barack Obama will soon send Hillary Clinton packing back to the Senate. Once she's gone, he needs to borrow one of the key tenets of her health care plan. She's right about health insurance: It needs to be mandatory.

The Massachusetts Remedy

That's not just a Democratic idea. Mitt Romney came to the same conclusion. As governor of Massachusetts, he implemented one of the most innovative state-level health care reforms. A key piece of that reform is mandatory health coverage.

Obviously, many people can't afford health insurance -- that's the reason they don't have it in the first place. But Romney's plan in Massachusetts provided government subsidies to make insurance more affordable for low-income residents. Any sensible program at the federal level would do the same.

That would leave no excuses: Everyone would have to have some kind of health insurance -- through an employer, through Medicaid or Medicare, or through some other approved plan. In the Massachusetts case, the state created a program to connect individuals with affordable insurance options. Those who can't prove that they're insured pay a steep penalty when they file their state income tax.

Spreading the Risk Around

So what's the economic rationale for such a heavy-handed approach from politicians as far from each other on the political spectrum as Hillary Clinton and Mitt Romney? Mandatory insurance is pretty much the only way to keep the American employer-based insurance model from collapsing completely. (And even that might not be enough.)

But health insurance is like any other kind of insurance: It pools risk. I buy homeowners insurance not because I think my house is going to burn down, but because in the highly unlikely event that it does, I would be protected from a financial disaster.

So I pay the insurance company a small but predictable amount to make that risk go away. If the insurance company is doing its job right, then the company will make more money from the houses that don't burn down than it pays out in claims for the houses that do burn down.

Too Smart for Our Own Good?

That's the point of insurance, whether it protects against natural disaster, fire, kidnapping (yes, there's kidnapping insurance), or anything else.

But health insurance is quickly becoming different than all other kinds of insurance: It's getting easier and easier to predict in advance who will get sick and who won't -- even decades in advance, thanks to our greater understanding of the human genome. Researchers have already identified some 1,800 disease-related genes. There are now home DNA kits that enable you to test yourself for many of them.

That may be great for medicine, but it's a disaster for the insurance market. How well would the homeowners insurance market work if we had an increasingly better idea of whose house would burn down and whose wouldn't?

A Policy Dilemma

Our ability to predict disease creates a dilemma for policymakers: If insurers are privy to such information -- if you and your family have to spit in a cup or donate a strand of hair before you get your insurance -- then the people who are most likely to become sick with expensive illnesses will soon be priced out of the market. Of course, those are the people who need insurance most.

The alternative doesn't work, either. Suppose we forbid insurance companies access to such information, and generally make it more difficult for insurance companies to screen out those with preexisting conditions or those with a genetic predisposition to get sick in the future. Such a policy would go a long way toward making insurance more affordable and accessible for those who need it most.

That seems eminently sensible -- until you think about it for six or seven seconds. If insurance companies are not allowed to screen out the worst risks, but each of us can look decades ahead into our relative long-term health, then those who are most likely to get sick will load up on the most insurance. Those with a better genetic draw will buy less or none.

An Insurance Anomaly

Imagine a world in which you could buy homeowner's insurance after you saw smoke coming from the basement. The first call would be 911; the second call would be to Allstate. (Or maybe the other way around.)

In the health insurance case, after your home DNA test generates bad news, the instructions on the box might say something like, "If you scored 81-90, now would be a good time to buy a generous health insurance policy with a low deductible." That would be great for patients, but not so good for health insurance companies. And once all the health insurance companies were bankrupt, it wouldn't be so good for patients, either.

The American health care system is a complete anomaly in the developed world. There's no other major industrialized country that depends so heavily on the private delivery of health care funded through a system of private health insurance.

Re-insuring Insurance

For better or for worse, that's the system we've got. Starting over from scratch is politically untenable, so if we're going to make the system we've got work better, we have to put the insurance back in insurance. We have to return to a system that really pools risk. The best way to do that is by mandating that everyone buy insurance -- those who are sick, those who aren't sick, those who'll get sick with expensive illnesses, and those who will die at home in their sleep after 95 healthy years.

This would accomplish two crucial objectives:

1. It would guarantee access to health insurance, and therefore reasonable health care, because everyone would have it from birth. There would be no preexisting conditions because there would be no "preexisting." Again, this is dependent on providing sufficient subsidies and insurance options for those who are too wealthy to be eligible for Medicaid but don't have an employer option and can't afford to buy private insurance.

2. It would bolster the financial health of the insurance system by including more "good risks" in the system, namely the healthy young people who are most likely to roll the dice and go without insurance.

Fair Is Fair

Is mandatory health insurance fair? In one sense, it's not: The healthy end up subsidizing the unhealthy. That's ultimately true with homeowners insurance, too, but buying into that arrangement is a voluntary decision. (And auto insurance, which is mandatory in many states, isn't a very good comparison, as that policy is designed primarily to protect against damage done to other drivers.)

But being diagnosed with a potentially terminal illness at age seven in a family with no way to pay for the treatment isn't really fair, either. Nor is paying 20 times as much for health insurance as someone else because you were born with a nasty strand of DNA on your 11th chromosome.

If you believe in pooling risk, which is the point of health insurance, then the only way to keep the system solvent in the long run is to get everyone in the pool. Mitt Romney realized that. So does Hillary Clinton. Once Obama has finally finished her off, he should borrow one of her better ideas.

by Charles Wheelan, Ph.D. Posted on Tuesday, May 20, 2008, 12:00AM

For more information about Insurance visit: http://www.InsurancePricedRight.com

For Information about Real Estate & Insurance visit: http://www.robertjrussell.com

Technorati : , , ,
Del.icio.us : , , ,
Zooomr : , , ,
Flickr : , , ,

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Health Information Privacy

The Office for Civil Rights enforces the HIPAA Privacy Rule, which protects the privacy of individually identifiable health information, and the confidentiality provisions of the Patient Safety Act, which protects identifiable information being used to analyze patient safety events and improve patient safety.

http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/index.html

http://www.insurancepricedright.com

Technorati : , , ,
Del.icio.us : , , ,
Zooomr : , , ,
Flickr : , , ,